June 21, 2005, 12:00 AM

Labeling unsolicited commercial e-mail won’t reduce spam, the FTC says

The CAN-Spam Act did little to reduce unsolicited e-mail, and requiring marketers to label advertising e-mails with the ADV designation will help just about as much, says a report just out from the FTC.

The CAN-Spam Act did little to reduce unsolicited e-mail, and requiring marketers to label advertising e-mails with the ADV designation will help just about as much, says a report just out from the Federal Trade Commission.

The CAN-Spam Act directed the FTC to study whether putting specific characters such as “ADV” in the subject lines of unsolicited commercial e-mail would make it easier for Internet service providers to identify and screen out spam.

In its report, the FTC says that state laws requiring such labeling had failed to reduce spam and that it doubted a federal law would have any impact.

It is “extremely unlikely that outlaw spammers would comply” with such a requirement, while legitimate marketers most likely would abide by the law, the report said. That means that commercial e-mail messages sent out by law-abiding marketers would be filtered out while spam would go straight through to consumers’ e-mail boxes, the FTC says.

Instead of labeling, emphasis should be placed on encouraging the industry to develop alternatives such as e-mail authentication, the FTC says.

comments powered by Disqus

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

From The IR Blog

FPO

Philip Rooke / E-Commerce

An online retailer’s view of the ‘Brexit’ debate

British web retailers could be left out of the e-commerce race as other players in ...

FPO

Ethan Senturia / E-Commerce

DSCR: The 4-letter term that's be critical for small e-retailer

Lenders will look at the ratio of operating income to debit, or the debt service ...

Advertisement